Anyone who has seen two children fighting over a single object in a room
 full of other equally fun toys can appreciate what philosopher René Girard was getting at when he described the human predicament as "mimetic desire"—we do not want what we want, we want what others want.
 While we would like to think that our deepest desires are unique to us 
and in some way define who we are, in reality, we are usually mimicking 
the desires of those around us. We all want someone else's toy.
With the advent of easy-access pornography delivered anonymously 
through the internet, the desires of others are increasingly controlling
 our sexual desires. Most of us assume that what we like or don't like 
sexually, our sexual preferences, come from within us, from latent 
desires we discovered as we gained sexual experiences. The reality is 
the opposite. Our sexual experiences accumulate as desires, training us 
to prefer what we've previously experienced. So as we vicariously 
experience sex-acts through pornography, we are training ourselves with 
powerful rewards of pleasure to mimic porn-like preferences.
The results are not pretty. Pornography is training more and more 
men desire sex-acts with women that are embarrassing, uncomfortable, or 
even painful for women to perform. Some people are discovering that they
 cannot orgasm while having partner sex but only through masturbation. 
They have trained themselves to enjoy masturbation more than anything 
else by having the majority of their sexual experiences that way and 
enhancing the experience through pornography.
When human beings open themselves to a broad range of sexual 
experiences, real or vicarious, the end result seems to be people who 
desire sexual experiences that are not mutually satisfying. This 
individualistic pursuit of pleasure through sex is commonly thought to 
be the way to enjoy sex to the fullest. But contrary to what most 
assume, research shows that it is married, not single, people who have 
the most sex on average, and married women are more likely to experience sexual satisfaction than single women.
What if, instead of becoming slaves to the influence of others 
desires, we reserved our all sexual experiences for one person with whom
 we shared a mutual, lifetime commitment; trained ourselves to prefer 
sex-acts that brought that person pleasure; and devoted a lifetime to 
getting better and better at pleasing each other sexually? Wouldn't that
 be (in the sense of developing unique sexual desires and fulfillment) true 
sexual freedom?
Of course, this is what Christianity, teaching sex only within the 
marriage relationship, has promoted for millennia. And not just that sex
 should be reserved for marriage, but that it ought to be regularly 
enjoyed in marriage. Perhaps it's an idea whose time has come.
This article originally appeared in the Clergy Comments column of the Fort McMurray Today (February 25, 2012).
Cross-posted to true love is....

Ya I think that before I got married the stored up images of years of addiction to pornography and masturbation while in high school skewed my ideas of what sex really was for a long time into my marriage, desiring that which was absurd and unrealistic, wanting to mimic what I had seen years ago (though there is a lot of freedom in marriage, some things are just perverted). It takes quite a long time to revert one's mind back that which God blessed as good and Holy.
ReplyDeleteps. That picture looks raunchie! haha
Nice topic.
ReplyDeleteI think there is research to back this up as well.
That image is not appropriate for an adventist's site. It's still porn
ReplyDeleteThe image was chosen because it represents the influence of multiple partners, while not showing any graphic nudity.
ReplyDeleteDavid, I really appreciate this perspective. We need to be able to talk intelligently about the far-reaching consequences of what we see online. This is literally ruining people's minds and their marriages. For singles, it's ruining their chances of going into a healthy, fulfilling intimate relationship. Thank you for posting.
ReplyDelete